docs(mail): correct ActiveSync claims + honest client-compat copy
ci / changes (push) Successful in 4s
ci / tc_booking (push) Successful in 21s
ci / tc_portal (push) Successful in 26s
ci / tc_operator (push) Successful in 23s
ci / tc_platform_api (push) Successful in 22s
ci / test_platform_api (push) Successful in 33s
ci / tc_website (push) Successful in 22s
ci / build_booking (push) Successful in 9s
ci / build_zpush (push) Successful in 1m2s
ci / build_portal (push) Successful in 41s
ci / build_operator (push) Successful in 4s
ci / build_platform_api (push) Successful in 4s
ci / deploy (push) Successful in 43s
ci / changes (push) Successful in 4s
ci / tc_booking (push) Successful in 21s
ci / tc_portal (push) Successful in 26s
ci / tc_operator (push) Successful in 23s
ci / tc_platform_api (push) Successful in 22s
ci / test_platform_api (push) Successful in 33s
ci / tc_website (push) Successful in 22s
ci / build_booking (push) Successful in 9s
ci / build_zpush (push) Successful in 1m2s
ci / build_portal (push) Successful in 41s
ci / build_operator (push) Successful in 4s
ci / build_platform_api (push) Successful in 4s
ci / deploy (push) Successful in 43s
Stalwart never had ActiveSync built in — that now comes from the zpush gateway. SERVICES.md gains a zpush section with debug commands; website copy (da+en) states what actually works: IMAP everywhere, CalDAV/CardDAV, Exchange accounts in the phone's built-in apps, CalDAV Synchronizer for Outlook on Windows.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ These choices are deliberate after extensive license/architecture research. See
|
||||
|
||||
| Component | License | Why this one |
|
||||
|-----------|---------|--------------|
|
||||
| Stalwart Mail | Apache 2.0 | Modern Rust, ActiveSync built-in, JMAP support |
|
||||
| Stalwart Mail | Apache 2.0 | Modern Rust, JMAP support (EAS via Z-Push gateway) |
|
||||
| OCIS | Apache 2.0 | Cleaner license than Nextcloud (AGPL+trademark) |
|
||||
| Zulip | Apache 2.0 | Only truly open-core-free chat option |
|
||||
| Authentik | MIT | Better multi-tenancy than Keycloak |
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user